Infoworld gives OS 10.5 a glowing review. No one is unhappy with Mac OS X Version 10.4, known as Tiger. OS X is not an application platform (I bristle at using the term “operating system” for OS X; I explain why below) that needed repair, speeding up, or exterior renovation. Motivations for major upgrades of competing system software — roll-ups of an unmanageable number of fixes, because the calendar says it’s time, or because users are perceived to have version fatigue — don’t apply to OS X. Apple wields no whip to force upgrades because Tiger stands no risk of being neglected by Apple or third-party developers as long as Leopard lives. Despite the absence of a stick that drives users into upgrades of competing OSes, or perhaps because of it, Apple enjoys an extraordinary rate of voluntary OS X upgrades among desktop and notebook users. Why? People buy Macs because the platform as a whole is perfect, full stop. Leopard is a rung above perfection. It’s taken as rote that the Mac blows away PC users’ expectations. Leopard blows away Mac users’ expectations, and that’s saying a great deal.
About The Author
Related Posts
Tags
Apple
canada
Conservative
Conservatives
Dalton McGuinty
David Miller
Death
dion
election
Environment
Google
Go Transit
green
gta
Harper
jack layton
John Tory
Liberal
Liberals
Linux
LRT
mccain
Metrolinx
Microsoft
NDP
Obama
Ontario
PC
politics
Prime Minister
Public Transit
Quebec
rob ford
Stephen Harper
Subway
subways
Toronto
Transit City
TTC
Ubuntu
United States
US
Vista
Viva
windows
Recent Comments